Youll also see the casing width increase with the 2.35 moving to 2.4, while the 2.6 option remains. While XC tires might not get much love from us, we do ride most of them and also sell lots of them. Bike Check: Cal Poly Students' Handmade All-Mountain Tandem - Sea Otter 2023, www.transylvaniatimes.com/lifestyles/popular-pnf-trail-receiving-needed-reroute/article_aff86265-21bb-5c1b-85f6-833d5944b1fa.html, www.amazon.com/Natrapel-Mosquito-Insect-Repellent-Individually-Wrapped/dp/B001ARBSTO. Forekaster being light filled a nice gap. The Ardent filled out to a nice profile on my 26mm rims. I will grant you though that a .25 inch difference on an Ikon on the same rim made a noticeable difference in volume and pressure I could roll with, and I'm guessing that imparts improvements, so I've considered going to a 2.4. For the rear, I opted for something a little lighter that I thought might be more likely to give it up in fast tight turns. Come join the discussion about bike parts, components, deals, performance, modifications, classifieds, trails, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more! More: The Best Bike Seats for Overweight Cyclists. Great under brakes. Ive found myself in some sketchy situations when its slipped out on me in flat turns. Maxxis' extensive line of mountain bike tires ensure the perfect tread pattern, compound, and casing option for any trail imaginable. I have the now older version and quite happy with it. This looks like a great tire. document.getElementById( "ak_js" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Rekon We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. I am cuurently running Forekaster up front and Ardent Race rear on a HT Stumpjumper. Little more bite on slickish conditions or loose climbs. The DHR2 is a hell of a tyre on the back though. I have the 2.4 Ardent on the front of my Yeti SB5 and Intense Primer. I went down on it yesterday, so it's time for something more sticky up front. https://www.dirtmerchantbikes.com/snorthwest-summer-2015-xc-tire-comparison-test. Lastly, I simply can't trust a trail tire that doesn't have some sort of added protection. Bikerumor Copyright 2013 2023. Stable sidewalls. As a rear tire, the Ardent has a lot of floats and can be a little drifty, while its more of a speed demon as a front tire. However, the tires are again similar in that they tend to have less grip and slip a little more on very loose terrain types. Once leaned over, the slightly offset two rows of side knobs grab and keep your tires planted on the dirt. The Forekaster is Maxxis's closest to the Nic- it's tougher, and heavier, but very similiar. XC Tires Maxxis Forekaster 2.35" (Front) & Rekon Race 2.35" (Rear) EXO +Lightweight +Fast rolling-Less traction-Less durable . The Forekaster will look like the offspring of the Ardent and Shorty tiresto many people with its open tread spacing and aggressive knobs. Spied these on Geoff Kabushs instagram a few weeks back, think I need some of these! Contact UsPrivacyForum RulesClassifieds RulesLink RemovalNewsletter SettingsAdvertising. It also happens to be pretty light for the amount of traction it provides, which I don't think anyone will complain about. Currently running a Forekaster up front on a bike and its been great. The Aspen also clears mud very well and while it might not have the overall height of some mud tires, the spaced-out tread allows more clearing when the dirt gets thick. The Ardent is decent as a rear tire, but to echo what many others have already posted, I would definitely not run them as a front tire. The Maxxis Forekaster used to sit squarely in the aggressive cross-country category, a tire with enough tread for slipperier conditions, but with a fairly low weight. It needs a bit more volume (2.35) but it was fine round a very muddy ashton court at new year. The result is a tire that blends low rolling resistance . The Fora platform includes forum software by XenForo. Tire Come join the discussion about bike parts, components, deals, performance, modifications, classifieds, trails, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more! MTB Parts & Accessories (Ep. Maybe a rear tire too. Weaknesses: A bit vague in intermediate corners. The Best Bike Seats for Overweight Cyclists, A responsive tire with low rolling resistance, Works well as a front or rear tire, balanced enough to use on both wheels, Good for most mountain trails and moderately aggressive riders, Tread does not perform as well in loose soils or mud, Overall design not as well suited to very aggressive cyclists or the most challenging trails, Newer tires offer a slightly better balance between grip and rolling resistance. Durability is one of the areas that the Ardent really shines. The hang up there is it's only .15 of an inch difference, and Maxxis tires often times won't measure out to their stated dimensions, so I might be stuck with the same tread after a swap if I just get a bigger Rekon. Tried one one . Like mine, Ardent 2.4 front, prefer Ardent Race 2.2 to normal Ardent at the rear, both tubeless on the original flow rims. Thats 200g less rotating mass! Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. Still, its always good to chat rubber init. As with the other classic Maxxis tires, the Ardent is available in a huge range of sizes, casings and rubber options, so I will list our more common combinations and sizes that we see. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. However since you already have them: XC, Road, XXC, Endurance, Mtn, All-Mtn, Cross, Gravel, just go have fun on 2 wheels! It also makes a great rear tire when looking for speed in the back and some more tread up front like what you would get with the Ardent, Ardent Race or Forekaster. The Ardent is just a touch thicker than the Ikon, 2.4 compared to 2.2. With the Protection reinforced sidewalls the casing is very tough and while the lovely logos of our test tyres are pretty scuffed up, we havent experienced any sidewall cuts or tears. We ran it as a dedicated front. Employee Review If the girl said no then the answer obviously is no, but she's not gonna say no. Based in Ohio, Zach is now slowly introducing a new generation to cycling and still trying to figure out how to fit the most rides into a busy schedule as a new dad. Two thumbs up. Apparently its now a tyre for short-travel trail bikes AKA downcountry bikes. Shame theyre quoting them as so heavy, the 292.4 is claimed at 945g, which puts it same weight as a Dissector and 2.3 DHR II. As you would expect, with more tread comes more weight. RUB Its a trail tyre, through and through, sitting somewhere between the Crossmark and legendary Minion in terms of rolling speed/grip stakes. Wow, 945g is pretty porky for an aggressive XC tire, thats dissector territory. CAD Although I am a Lancastrian, I freely admit that West Yorkshire is my favourite place to ride. It strikes a balance between speed and traction for the rear when riding aggressively. Great for XC trails and with a new tread and tire profile every few seasons, theyve cornered the market on creating a durable line of high-performance for price mountain bike tires. While it may no longer be marketed as a wet conditions specific tire, the new Forekaster is still designed to shed mud well, with raised edges on the casing. Highly-regarded tire maker Maxxis continues to expand its popular Wide Trail lineup with new versions of the Rekon, Forekaster, Ardent Race, Aggressor, High . Slightly faster rolling speed with the same grip could have me changing to one of these new ones. Its no weight weenie xc tire but it does roll much better than either of the Maxxis Minions. While true cross country racers will be looking for the best weight and rolling speed they can get, our tire choices tend to also have a heavy emphasis on traction. The Aspen has some small race size ramped knobs in the center with larger more aggressive side knobs. Originally as OE tyres in 3C trimming and latterly non-3C aftermarket. Users are generally very pleased by this tire, especially used in combination with a more aggressive design that offers better grip for added traction and better all-condition performance. If your your rims are inner width i25mm or wider (which is how most XC bikes come these days), you might consider a 2.6in tire like the Maxxis Rekon. Its a great tire that works in many types of trail conditions. The tread pattern is pretty unique. The grip afforded by the Trail Kings got better with a bit of trail time, the tyres losing their coating and the knobs becoming more pliable (but still supportive). I would never run it as a front tire and the brief period that I have, it was filled with constant washouts. I've run the Ardent/Forekaster combo and it was better than a Forekaster on both. They sure looked the part for a do all tire in the Pacific North Wet (yes wet) with their well-spaced ramped center tread and transition nobs. Honestly, I'd get rid of the Ardent. They didnt really need that many racy XC rubbers. Ride the fastest tires you feel confident on. Weaknesses: Not available in 27.5 or 29 in Australia yet. 3C is a good addition but I really dont want a tyre just shy of 1kg for my riding. FEATURES OF THE NEW MAXXIS FOREKASTER INCLUDE: A densely packed tread pattern to increase rolling efficiency Taller side knobs to improve cornering grip Raised ridges on the casing to promote. No thanks. Pinkbike Poll: How Many Volume Spacers Do You Run? 2022 Knolly Fugitive 138. They arent completely impervious though, and youll still likely need a patch if you run over the business end of a nail or screw. Never again! I thought the old Forekaster was ok for what it was. The old Forekaster was basically Maxxis version of the Nobby Nic, but then Schwalbe updated the Nic tread with more aggressive and closely spaced cornering knobs and which improved that tyre immensely. Never hated it but it simply has been surpassed by other tires (XR4 in that camp as well as mentioned above). BRL I think I found a better combo here for the mid travel trail bike and longer rides. Skatey at first. Dual compound or 3C MaxxTerra options EXO sidewall protection Tubeless Ready (TR) Bicycle technology Category: XC, Trail 4.23) [Video], CushCore Trail Insert - The Perfect Middle Ground For Tubeless Inserts, Wolf Tooth ReMote Pro - The New & Refined Dropper Remote. For fast hardpack punctuated by loose, dry sections, the Dissector has few equals. While Ardent tires are very durable and rolling resistance and reactivity dont generally change much with wear, they do tend to become more prone to slips and drifting as they age. At low pressures, the Hans Dampf has a large footprint that floats beautifully over sand and delivers mountains of climbing traction. As an all-weather, all-rounder, we rate the Ardents very highly. The Ardent is also decently fast-rolling considering the tread height and does decently well with clearing mud as well. An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. But despite this, their weight is reasonable and their rolling speed remarkable too. There are UST or Revo Tubeless Ready versions of this tyre unless youre very hard on tyres, wed suggest the Revo version is fine. The tread has been beefed up a little, and Maxxis now says it's designed for modern short travel trail bikes. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. The center tread is ramped but tightly packed to roll fast with side knobs that have an alternating stepped pattern to them. Theres also very little tuck under risk with the Forekaster, even with the most aggressive out of saddle pedaling, challenging terrain, or now. A lot of people are running Dissectors up front on downcountry / short travel bikes, myself included.

Best Picture Settings For Insignia 4k Tv, Abt Summer Intensive Location Rankings, Modern Naval Battles Global Warfare, Teleonce Puerto Rico Noticias, Longhorn Managing Partner Salary, Articles M